Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) has long been used to combat dangerous fuel fires, particularly by firefighters, military personnel, and airport emergency crews. While its ability to suppress fires is undeniable, the foam’s chemical composition has come under intense scrutiny.
As the connection between AFFF exposure and serious health risks—especially cancer—has become clearer, Dolman Law Group’s AFFF litigation team has taken a leading role in helping victims seek justice.
For years, AFFF was used without full awareness of the dangers posed by its toxic ingredients, especially PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). Known as “forever chemicals,” PFAS persist in the environment and the human body, leading to long-term exposure even after use has ceased.
Studies have now linked PFAS exposure to various cancers, including kidney, testicular, liver, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, as well as other health complications.
Understanding the Legal Battle Behind AFFF
Victims of AFFF exposure are turning to the legal system in growing numbers. Dolman Law Group has positioned itself at the forefront of this litigation, representing individuals who were unknowingly exposed to PFAS through their work or environment. This includes firefighters, military service members, airport workers, and residents living near military bases or industrial sites where AFFF was frequently used.
The firm is actively involved in nationwide multidistrict litigation (MDL), where cases have been consolidated to streamline the legal process and pursue compensation more efficiently. These lawsuits allege that manufacturers of AFFF knowingly produced and sold foam products containing harmful chemicals without adequate warnings, despite evidence suggesting serious health risks.
Building a Strong Case for Victims
Dolman Law Group’s approach to these cases is thorough and aggressive. Their legal team works closely with toxicology experts, medical professionals, and environmental scientists to build compelling evidence that links AFFF exposure to specific health conditions. They focus on:
- Verifying clients’ direct or environmental exposure to AFFF
- Documenting medical diagnoses and treatment histories
- Tracing the presence of PFAS in blood or environmental samples
- Establishing liability based on the manufacturer’s knowledge and failure to warn
This meticulous case-building helps maximize the chances of success, whether through negotiated settlements or trial verdicts.
Who May Be Eligible to File?
If you or a loved one was exposed to AFFF and later diagnosed with cancer or other serious health conditions, you may be eligible to file a claim. Common qualifying criteria include:
- Occupational exposure to AFFF (e.g., firefighters, military personnel, airport workers)
- Living or working near AFFF training or spill sites
- Medical documentation of cancers or illnesses linked to PFAS exposure
- Evidence of AFFF use or contamination in your area
Even if you’re unsure whether your case qualifies, Dolman Law Group offers case evaluations to help victims understand their legal options.
Holding Corporations Accountable
Beyond pursuing financial compensation for victims, Dolman Law Group is committed to holding negligent corporations accountable. The AFFF litigation is not only about recovering damages—it’s about pushing for greater corporate responsibility and ensuring safer practices in the future.
Manufacturers who put profits over public safety must be held liable for the harm caused by their products. Through this litigation, Dolman Law Group aims to drive systemic change in how hazardous chemicals are regulated and disclosed.
Looking Ahead
As more people become aware of the dangers associated with AFFF, the number of lawsuits continues to grow. Bellwether trials in the coming years will help set the stage for broader settlements and legal precedents. With an experienced team and a deep commitment to justice, Dolman Law Group is prepared to lead the charge.
For victims and their families, legal action offers not just the possibility of compensation but also a path toward closure and accountability. By holding manufacturers responsible, these cases serve as a powerful reminder that public health must never take a back seat to corporate interests.
